The debate on capital punishment

Why the era of capital punishment is ending By David Von Drehle The case of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev absorbed Americans as no death-penalty drama has in years.

The debate on capital punishment

History Anarchist Auguste Vaillant guillotined in France in Execution of criminals has been used by nearly all societies since the beginning of civilizations on Earth. The use of formal execution extends to the beginning of recorded history.

Most historical records and various primitive tribal practices indicate that the death penalty was a part of their justice system. Communal punishment for wrongdoing generally included compensation by the wrongdoer, corporal punishmentshunningbanishment and execution.

Usually, compensation and shunning were enough as a form of justice. A blood feud or vendetta occurs when arbitration between families or tribes fails or an arbitration system is non-existent.

Capital Punishment in the United States

This form of justice was common before the emergence of an arbitration system based on state or organized religion. It may result from crime, land disputes or a code of honour. In most countries that practise capital punishment it is now reserved for murderterrorismwar crimesespionagetreasonor as part of military justice.

In some countries sexual crimes, such as rapefornicationadulteryincest and sodomycarry the death penalty, as do religious crimes such as Hudud and Qisas crimes, such as apostasy formal renunciation of the state religionblasphemymoharebehhirabahFasadMofsed-e-filarz and witchcraft.

In many countries that use the death penaltydrug trafficking is also a capital offence. In Chinahuman trafficking and serious cases of corruption and financial crimes are punished by the death penalty.

In militaries around the world courts-martial have imposed death sentences for offences such as cowardicedesertioninsubordinationand mutiny. Elaborations of tribal arbitration of feuds included peace settlements often done in a religious context and compensation system.

Compensation was based on the principle of substitution which might include material for example, cattle, slave compensation, exchange of brides or grooms, or payment of the blood debt. Settlement rules could allow for animal blood to replace human blood, or transfers of property or blood money or in some case an offer of a person for execution.

The person offered for execution did not have to be an original perpetrator of the crime because the system was based on tribes, not individuals. Blood feuds could be regulated at meetings, such as the Norsemen things. One of the more modern refinements of the blood feud is the duel.

In certain parts of the world, nations in the form of ancient republics, monarchies or tribal oligarchies emerged.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

These nations were often united by common linguistic, religious or family ties. Moreover, expansion of these nations often occurred by conquest of neighbouring tribes or nations.

Consequently, various classes of royalty, nobility, various commoners and slave emerged. Accordingly, the systems of tribal arbitration were submerged into a more unified system of justice which formalized the relation between the different "classes" rather than "tribes".

The debate on capital punishment

The Torah Jewish Lawalso known as the Pentateuch the first five books of the Christian Old Testamentlays down the death penalty for murder, kidnappingmagicviolation of the Sabbathblasphemyand a wide range of sexual crimes, although evidence suggests that actual executions were rare.

The Romans also used death penalty for a wide range of offences.

The debate on capital punishment

When abolishing the death penalty Xuanzong ordered his officials to refer to the nearest regulation by analogy when sentencing those found guilty of crimes for which the prescribed punishment was execution.

Thus depending on the severity of the crime a punishment of severe scourging with the thick rod or of exile to the remote Lingnan region might take the place of capital punishment.THE DEBATE: CAPITAL PUNISHMENTSHOULD BE MAINTAINED FROM TESTIMONY OF ANN SCOTT, TULSA, OKLAHOMA, BEFORE THE U.S.

Source for information on The Debate: Capital Punishment Should be Maintained: Capital Punishment: Cruel and Unusual? dictionary. Abolishing capital punishment is the international trend and Japan should respect international human rights law. • Politicians should resist pandering to the public and instead should demonstrate leadership and move toward convincing citizens to support abolishing the death penalty.

Source Biographies Site Map Notices Archive Glossary Death Penalty Debate Video Most death penalty cases involve the execution of murderers although capital punishment can also be applied for treason, espionage, and other crimes.

Punishment. Punishment involves the deliberate infliction of suffering on a supposed or actual offender for an offense such as a moral or legal transgression. Jun 22,  · The question as to whether or not it is morally acceptable for the state to execute people, and if so under what circumstances, has been debated for centuries.

Capital punishment is the execution of a person by the state as punishment for a crime. Crimes that can result in the death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offenses.

Capital punishment has been used in societies throughout history as a way to punish crime and suppress political dissent.

5 Arguments For And Against The Death Penalty - Listverse